|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Poopsock Alarmclock
Minmatar
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
   |
Posted - 2009.03.24 14:56:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: enjoi
Originally by: Swamp Ziro
hey i should rpobably get a new sig
I remember when your posts used to be epic :(
I remember when you had space
|
Poopsock Alarmclock
Minmatar
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 14:59:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Yonker
In order to re-form quickly they had to use this already created Alliance with a different name, right?
So, they had a choice... either lose Sov, or lose their name. They made a choice to keep sov.
So what rule is it that says if you don't like the consequence of your decision... CCP will adjust the game to fit your needs? I'm sure A LOT of scammed people would like to petition CCP under this new rule of "Not having to take responsibility for your actions".
this is pretty much the whole thing right here
pubbies don't understand it because well :sov:
beaver/GMs refuse to address it
band of developers keeps on truckin
|
Poopsock Alarmclock
Minmatar
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 20:47:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Only the pirate fleet petitioned against us for intentionally creating lag (by deploying space mines) and the GM teleported their entire group past our gatecamp to somewhere else in our system and let them continue on their rampage. As a result we ended up engaging in less than optimal circumstances and lost our fleet and in the coming days that defeat was magnified into the eventual loss of the alliance in Venal.
ahahahaha
can anyone who doesn't roleplay a tranny space prostitute c/d this pile of :cripesduck:
|
Poopsock Alarmclock
Minmatar
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 13:25:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Cautet
The issue wasn't a normal one. It involved an Alliance name being blocked at the same time as an Alliances sov was removed in a coordinated metagaming attack.
first, the disbanding of BoB was done using working-as-intended in-game mechanics, unlike the renaming of Kenzoku
secondly, BoB could have chosen the BOBR name when they were disbanded, but instead they chose to piggyback on the existing Kenzoku alliance so they could start claiming sov immediately with their towers
CCP have said repeatedly that what happened to BoB was 100% valid as far as CCP is concerned, therefore there is no reason for allowing the Kenzoku alliance to be renamed to BOBR
|
Poopsock Alarmclock
Minmatar
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.25 18:50:00 -
[5]
Edited by: ****sock Alarmclock on 25/03/2009 18:50:25
Originally by: Jade Constantine
:words:
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
efb and I don't care crew checkin' in
|
|
|
| |
|